All solutions
Book a demo

Proposed demo for Rodic · simulated data

Infrastructure / EPC · Use case 2

See the ripple of a drawing revision before it reaches site.

Proposed agents connect a revision to quantities, BOQ cost, purchase orders, the critical path and what is already built, then compare alternatives. The Design Lead and the Project Manager decide.

Book a demo Open the live demo

Rodic Consultants (proposed tenant) · proposed, not deployed

Impact simulator with ripple diagram, quantities and Gantt (simulated data) Proposed demo for Rodic · simulated data
  1. RevisionPier caps P44–P51 deepened
  2. Impact+₹23.6 lakh, +4 days
  3. Option B+₹14.6 lakh, +1 day
  4. IssuedCN-C2-0147 after two signatures

The problem

A revision is drawn in hours and felt for months.

A deeper pier cap changes concrete and steel, hits a purchase order with a long lead time, moves the critical path and may mean demolishing what was cast last week. Those effects are usually found one at a time, after issue.

  1. 01

    Quantities drift from the BOQ

    Extra concrete, steel and formwork are counted late, and the variation-eligible share is argued later still.

  2. 02

    Procurement is hit blind

    A changed bearing or rebar grade can push a PO past its lead time and onto the critical path.

  3. 03

    Rework hides on site

    Elements already cast to the old revision become rework unless the change is caught before the next pour.

How it works

Six agents simulate. Two people decide.

Proposed Designer, Commercial, Procurement, Project Manager, Execution and Knowledge agents each assess one domain. ThoughtShieldAI keeps the lineage and the cost of the simulation.

  1. Compare revisions

    Before and after elevations and sections with changed elements highlighted and numbered.

  2. Quantities & cost

    m³, tonnes and m² against the BOQ, priced in ₹ and split into variation-eligible and notice-needed.

  3. Procurement & schedule

    Affected POs and long-lead items; before and after Gantt with float and the critical path.

  4. Rework risk

    Site status from the execution feed: what is cast, what is next to pour, and the rework per option.

  5. Design Lead and PM sign

    The Design Lead picks the option and signs; the Project Manager approves the schedule change.

    Human step

  6. Change notice

    Issued with numbered citations; downstream teams are notified.

The human approval

Meera Raghavan and Vikram Sethi · Design Lead and Project Manager (fictional)

The Design Lead confirms she has reviewed the evidence before signing Option B. The PM separately approves the schedule impact.

The scenario

Rev C of a pier cap drawing, simulated end to end.

Drawing C2-VD-STR-PC-1124 on the fictional Metro Viaduct Corridor C2. Carbon figures are labelled estimates from indicative factors.

  1. 01

    A revision lands in the register

    Rev C deepens pier caps P44–P51 from 1,800 to 2,100 mm after geotech addendum GTR-C2-019. Status: under impact review.

    Revision register with drawing status and history (simulated data) Proposed demo for Rodic · simulated data

  2. 02

    What changed, element by element

    Before and after elevation and section with each changed element highlighted and numbered.

    Before and after pier cap elevation with changed elements (simulated data) Proposed demo for Rodic · simulated data

  3. 03

    The ripple, quantified

    +42 m³ concrete, +6.8 t steel, +45.6 m² formwork and +₹23.6 lakh (₹15.2 lakh variation-eligible). Bearing PO-C2-4471 slips 9 days, the critical path moves 4 days, and P44 and P45 are already cast.

    Impact simulator with ripple diagram, quantities and Gantt (simulated data) Proposed demo for Rodic · simulated data

  4. 04

    Three alternatives, one cited recommendation

    Option B, Fe 550D with the depth retained, costs +₹14.6 lakh and +1 day. It saves ₹9.0 lakh and 3 days against Rev C, with the reasons cited.

    Alternatives A, B and C compared on cost, days, risk and carbon (simulated data) Proposed demo for Rodic · simulated data

  5. 05

    Signed, issued, notified

    Meera Raghavan signs Option B, Vikram Sethi approves the schedule, and change notice CN-C2-0147 issues to five downstream teams.

    Design Lead approval and drafted change notice (simulated data) Proposed demo for Rodic · simulated data

  6. 06

    The lineage behind the notice

    Source, recommendation, collaboration, approval and outcome, with models, routes, ₹ simulation cost and the full audit trail.

    Governance chain and audit trail for the change (simulated data) Proposed demo for Rodic · simulated data

Governance and lineage

From source data to outcome, every link kept.

The decision chain behind this scenario, as ThoughtShieldAI records it. Each step can be opened in the live demo.

  1. Source data

    Geotech addendum GTR-C2-019, drawing C2-VD-STR-PC-1124 Rev C, BOQ, PO-C2-4471, programme, execution feed

  2. AI recommendation

    Impact simulation: +₹23.6 lakh, +4 days, ₹8.4 lakh rework on P44–P45

  3. Agent collaboration

    Six agents assess quantities, cost, procurement, schedule, rework and precedent; alternatives A, B, C

  4. Human approval

    Meera Raghavan, Design Lead, signs Option B; Vikram Sethi, PM, approves the schedule

  5. Execution outcome

    Change notice CN-C2-0147 issued; five teams notified

Atlas

Drawing-to-element lineage

Each drawing linked to the elements, BOQ items, POs and activities it touches.

Nexus

Two-signature rule

Design option and schedule change need separate named approvals before a notice can issue.

Pulse

Simulation cost

Model calls and ₹ cost of each simulation against budget, shown on the governance strip.

Security

Audit trail

Every simulation, option view, approval and notification, in order.

Live demo

Play it yourself.

The full Design Change & Impact Simulator app runs right here, offline, with simulated data. Press Play demo for the guided scenario (about 80 seconds), or click around freely. Reset is in the top bar.

/demos/rodic-design/register Proposed demo for Rodic · simulated data Open in new tab (opens in a new tab)
Open the live demo

Designed for screens 1280 px and wider. On a phone it opens full screen.

Outcomes

What the scenario changed.

₹9.0 lakh
saved by Option B against Rev C
3 days
of critical path protected
₹8.4 lakh
rework exposure surfaced on cast elements
5
downstream teams notified on issue

SimulatedSimulated outcomes from a proposed demo scenario. Rodic has not deployed these agents.

Questions buyers ask first

Does it replace the design engineer?

No. The agents quantify and compare. The Design Lead chooses the option and signs; the Project Manager approves the schedule change.

Where does site status come from?

In the demo, from a simulated execution feed that marks elements as cast, in progress or not started.

How are carbon figures calculated?

They are labelled estimates from indicative factors, not a life-cycle assessment.

Has Rodic deployed this?

No. This is a proposed demo with simulated data and fictional projects and people.

See it on your own workflow.

A 30-minute walkthrough of the live demo, then a conversation about the agents, data and approvals in your environment.

Book a demo Open the live demo

Opens an email to hello@anvevoice.app · Proposed demo for Rodic · simulated data

More from ThoughtShieldAI